Sabtu, 16 Januari 2010

[Z869.Ebook] Download Ebook Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller

Download Ebook Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller

Get the link to download this Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller as well as start downloading and install. You could really want the download soft file of the book Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller by going through various other activities. And that's all done. Currently, your resort to check out a publication is not constantly taking and carrying guide Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller all over you go. You can conserve the soft file in your gizmo that will never be away as well as review it as you such as. It is like reviewing story tale from your device after that. Currently, start to like reading Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller as well as get your brand-new life!

Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller

Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller



Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller

Download Ebook Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller

Simply for you today! Discover your favourite e-book right here by downloading and install and getting the soft file of guide Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller This is not your time to traditionally likely to the book establishments to purchase an e-book. Here, selections of book Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller and also collections are available to download and install. Among them is this Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller as your recommended book. Obtaining this publication Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller by online in this website can be understood now by visiting the link web page to download. It will be easy. Why should be right here?

Even the cost of a publication Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller is so budget friendly; lots of people are really stingy to reserve their money to get the e-books. The various other factors are that they really feel bad and have no time at all to visit the book store to look the book Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller to review. Well, this is modern age; a lot of publications can be got quickly. As this Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller and a lot more e-books, they could be got in very fast ways. You will not should go outside to get this book Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller

By seeing this page, you have done the right gazing point. This is your begin to select guide Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller that you desire. There are great deals of referred e-books to read. When you intend to obtain this Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller as your book reading, you can click the link page to download and install Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller In few time, you have actually owned your referred e-books as all yours.

Due to the fact that of this e-book Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller is offered by on the internet, it will ease you not to publish it. you can get the soft documents of this Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller to conserve in your computer system, kitchen appliance, and a lot more gadgets. It depends on your determination where and also where you will review Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller One that you require to always keep in mind is that reviewing book Now: The Physics Of Time, By Richard A. Muller will never ever finish. You will have going to read various other publication after finishing a book, as well as it's continually.

Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller

“Now” is a simple yet elusive concept.

You are reading the word “now” right now. But what does that mean? What makes the ephemeral moment “now” so special? Its enigmatic character has bedeviled philosophers, priests, and modern-day physicists from Augustine to Einstein and beyond. Einstein showed that the flow of time is affected by both velocity and gravity, yet he despaired at his failure to explain the meaning of “now.” Equally puzzling: why does time flow? Some physicists have given up trying to understand, and call the flow of time an illusion, but the eminent experimentalist physicist Richard A. Muller protests. He says physics should explain reality, not deny it.

In Now, Muller does more than poke holes in past ideas; he crafts his own revolutionary theory, one that makes testable predictions. He begins by laying out―with the refreshing clarity that made Physics for Future Presidents so successful―a firm and remarkably clear explanation of the physics building blocks of his theory: relativity, entropy, entanglement, antimatter, and the Big Bang. With the stage then set, he reveals a startling way forward.

Muller points out that the standard Big Bang theory explains the ongoing expansion of the universe as the continuous creation of new space. He argues that time is also expanding and that the leading edge of the new time is what we experience as “now.” This thought-provoking vision has remarkable implications for some of our biggest questions, not only in physics but also in philosophy―including the ongoing debate about the reality of free will. Moreover, his theory is testable. Muller’s monumental work will spark major debate about the most fundamental assumptions of our universe, and may crack one of physics’s longest-standing enigmas.

42 illustrations

  • Sales Rank: #2459 in Books
  • Published on: 2016-09-20
  • Released on: 2016-09-20
  • Original language: English
  • Number of items: 1
  • Dimensions: 9.50" h x 1.20" w x 6.50" l, .0 pounds
  • Binding: Hardcover
  • 368 pages

Amazon.com Review
An Amazon Best Book of September 2016: Are you ready to have your mind blown? The topic of time and the theory of relativity sounds, well, merely theoretical until you realize upon reading Now that our GPS satellites have to compensate for time dilation constantly—otherwise they’d send us a location that’s inaccurate by almost a mile and a half. Muller’s enthusiasm for physics propels the reader through complex ideas such as space-time, entropy, the flexibility of space, lightspeed loopholes, and his dislike of string theory. Calvin and Hobbes cartoons and Terminator references sit side by side with equations such as Entropy = k log W—but don’t let that alarm you. The best nonfiction books expand your knowledge, and Now takes that effort one step further by expanding how you actually think about so-called reality. Muller’s love of physics will charm even those who want nothing to do with the subject, and even more engaging is his humility about the extent of our current understanding of how the universe works: “I think we can take joy in the speculation that we are not running out of important things to discover.” With Now, readers will find plenty that will expand their brains and prepare them for that next amazing discovery. --Adrian Liang, The Amazon Book Review

Review
“Mind-blowing ideas demand to be shared.…[Muller] posits a theory that seems at once plausible and―surprisingly, for a book with equations―one worth not spoiling.” (Time)

“Richard Muller is a leading physicist, but he’s also intellectually restless. That’s a potent combination, with the power to generate transformative ideas about ourselves and our relationship to the universe. In Now: The Physics of Time, Muller hypothesizes how time itself might be created or destroyed. Maybe it’s right. Maybe it’s wrong. But along the way he’s given you a master class in what time is and how and why we perceive it the way we do.” (Neil deGrasse Tyson, astrophysicist and host of Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey)

“Muller has taken a remarkably fresh and exciting approach to the analysis of time. With his usual clarity and wit, he proceeds from solidly established principles―each a fascinating story in its own right―but when he gets to the meaning of the flow of time and now, he forges a new path. I expect controversy!” (Saul Perlmutter, winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics)

“Can science shed light on time’s dark mysteries? Richard Muller thinks it can, making his case in this clear, evocative, and wide-reaching investigation of how nature may generate the flow of time. Must-reading for all concerned with the why behind when.” (Timothy Ferris, author of Coming of Age in the Milky Way)

“A provocative, strongly argued book on the fundamental nature of time. As an experimental cosmologist who has initiated some of the most important experiments of our time, Muller knows well where the limits of science are, and he keeps us interested by his ability to work close to that edge.” (Lee Smolin, author of Time Reborn)

“The strength of this book lies in Muller’s experience as a lecturer and teacher, which has enabled him to describe and explain difficult concepts with simplicity.… [Now] provides a concise master class in understanding the essentials of physics.” (Science)

“Time spent with Muller will transform readers' understanding of time itself.…A mind-expanding venture to the frontiers of science―and beyond!” (Booklist (starred review))

“The kind of mind-expanding read that will give you something to think about late at night. Muller's passion for his topic shines through on every page.” (The Independent)

About the Author
Richard A. Muller is professor of physics at the University of California, Berkeley, and the best-selling author of Physics for Future Presidents. For his outstanding work in experimental cosmology, he was awarded a 1982 MacArthur “Genius” Fellowship, and also a share of the 2015 Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics for the discovery of dark energy.

Most helpful customer reviews

77 of 82 people found the following review helpful.
Two thirds of a good book: 3.5 stars
By Ash Jogalekar
This book by Berkeley physicist Richard Muller is a combination of very interesting and disappointing. The main goal of the book is to provide an overview of a new theory of the generation of time that Muller has proposed. According to Muller, just like space expands as the universe expands, so does time. Thus, when the Big Bang occurred, along with new space new time was also created, and new time continues to be created even as the expansion of the universe is accelerating.

This is a very interesting and in fact fascinating hypothesis. Muller even provides some preliminary, testable experimental hypotheses of the hypothesis: always a mark of a good scientist. Unfortunately this theory constitutes only about 30% of the book. The rest of the book is devoted to building up to the theory and then indulging rather superficially in philosophical concepts that don't really seem to have much of a connection to the main thesis.

The first part of the book which explains relativity, thermodynamics and quantum theory is on a sound footing. What I like about Muller is that he is not afraid to be opinionated and to point out common misunderstandings that both students and experts have (for example, he dispels the common misunderstanding that in relativity, different observers "disagree" on the properties of different events). The part on thermodynamics is actually quite illuminating, especially when Muller comes down hard on Arthur Eddington's thesis that entropy drives the arrow of time from the past to the future. Muller tells us that the connection between entropy and time both increasing has been presented to us by biased events like eggs and teacups breaking. But as he says, teacups can also be built up, and even this event - which involves a decrease and not increase in entropy - is correlated with an increase in time. Thus, Eddington's correlation between entropy increase and time is just that, a correlation that does not have experimental support and does not make testable predictions. Eddington seems to have misled several generations of science writers, students and physicists. I had not quite appreciated this fact.

So far so good, but the last third of the book then sort of unravels as Muller flits from one philosophical topic to another. Many of these seem dimly connected to the book's main proposal, and I also found some of the sentence constructions rather clumsy. These include free will, souls and empathy, and Muller mostly recycles stuff that other people have said (the one interesting thing that he says is that faster-than-light travel would violate free will because effects could then precede causes); his treatment of these topics is rather superficial in my opinion and the style is quite rambling. He comes back to what he calls the '4D Big Bang' suddenly at the end of the book.

Overall I think this book is valuable and at times even highly provocative for its presentation of the uncertain connection between entropy and the 'arrow of time' and for its novel idea of the creation of new time. Those chapters are very much worth reading. But the rest of the book is more like a haphazard stream of consciousness exploring topics whose connection to the physics is not really clear. Muller is a truly outstanding scientist who has massively contributed to physics and physics education (several of his students have won Nobel Prizes) over three decades, a restless intellect and a fine teacher, but this book may not showcase the best of all these qualities.

46 of 46 people found the following review helpful.
An excellent book written by a great physicist who is also a great educator
By Aaron C. Brown
This is an excellent book, and I particularly recommend it in combination with Sean Carroll's recently published The Big Picture. Both books cover the modern understanding of the nature of reality with precision and without jargon; at a level that intelligent non-specialist readers can readily understand; and incorporate historical perspectives that clarify the accounts. Remarkably, there is very little overlap between the two books. Moreover, in addition to teaching some fundamental physics, the two books have opposing philosophic points. Carroll argues for naturalism, while Muller makes the case against physicalism (naturalism and physicalism are not entirely synonymous, but the main historical difference is philosophers invented naturalism to make philosophy more scientific, while scientists invented physicalism to oppose philosophies not reducible to scientific terms, therefore they are constructive versus destructive approaches to the same issue).

Carroll is the better writer, there is more pleasure in reading his book. Muller's style is clear but wooden, despite some lame attempts to work in quotations, popular culture and professor jokes; he also has a tendency to repeat himself, and to promise frequently that ideas will be explored further later, more frequently than the promises are kept. A minor point is I couldn't figure out his attitudes toward other people. He makes a number of cryptic comments that could be taken as criticisms, but could just be clumsy formulations, and he mentions some names that are considerably less relevant than ones he leaves out. He invariably precedes mentions of Luis Alvarez with "my mentor," which makes him sound a bit like Mr. Collins.

On the other hand, Carroll's verbal skill is used to conceal some of the important nuts and bolts of his arguments, while Muller is meticulous about working through to the actual equations and principles. It is quite an accomplishment to keep the discussion at the high theoretical level he maintains, while limiting the math to tenth-grade algebra and geometry. I find it ironic that the naturalist is more willing to rely on intuition and suggestion, while the anti-physicalist is rigorous about measurement and quantities.

As you would guess from the title, "now" is an essential concept to Muller. He rejects the common (but to my mind incoherent) view that the arrow of time is determined by increasing entropy since the Big Bang. If that were true, now would have no special status, it would just be the measurement of distance from the Big Bang. But Muller believes now is happening, while the past is frozen and the future has not yet happened. Now is when the wheel is in spin, we placed our bets in the past, and will reap the payoff in the future. He sketches some possible experimental tests of this idea, for example measuring the rate of time in distant galaxies, but also makes some non-physical arguments for it.

These latter points concentrate on what I consider the easy part; how non-physical forces could affect the physical universe; not the hard part; what the non-physical forces are). He is correct that most physicists reject non-physical arguments because they can be used to support anything. But if there is structure to the non-physical forces, like consciousness and free will, then I think few people would have difficulty with the idea that they affect the physical world through manipulating quantum effects that appear random in experiments. I have a problem with conceptualizing a non-physical computer capable of not only choosing actions, but of manipulating wave function collapses in order to affect atoms in molecules in neurons in a brain with a predictable macro result, like a person pulling a trigger or not. Nevertheless, until consciousness and free will (or their illusions) are explained, there is room for antiphysicalists.

Another weakness in Muller's argument is that he only considers a naive physicalism. Carroll argues that the things Muller wants to preserve, like virtue and beauty, are emergent properties; real and important even though they are not reducible to physical measurement (but Carroll cannot save free will, which matters a lot to Muller, although he does not claim to know whether or not it exists). Muller wants room for a God outside the physical universe, not a creator or object of worship, but a moral referent. Carroll is happy to accept that kind of God, but only as emergent from physical reality.

I do have one technical gripe. Muller refers to a two-standard deviation result as meaning there is a 95% chance that an experimental indication is true, and a 14 standard deviation event as having 10^-44 probability of occurring by chance. The nature of randomness is at the heart of his topic, since what distinguishes now from past and future is the possibility of multiple outcomes--deterministic, random or some non-physical third way. The meaning of a two standard deviation result on the probability of an assertion depends on the prior probability you assigned to the assertion plus all relevant alternatives.

And there are many types of 14 standard deviations events with different probabilities. Muller is thinking of something like flipping a fair coin and getting 14^2 = 196 heads in a row. N^2 heads in a row is an N standard deviation event. In this case that has a 10^-59 probability, the 10^-44 comes from assuming a Gaussian distribution. But it is also an N standard deviation event to get N^2 heads in a row if you picked a coin at random from a pile with 1 two-headed coin and N^2 two-tailed coins. That event has probability 1/(N^2 + 1) or 1/197. It might seem unfair to pick on such a common error, but Muller is strict about his math, so he can be held to a strict standard.

I think Muller overstates the significance of Gödel's incompleteness theorems for physicists. We have no reason to believe that ordinary mathematics contains physically important non-provable truths, or even if it does, that we can't easily get by with two or a few different mathematical schemes. Similarly, I would deny that the irrationality of the square root of two could never be determined physically. It's true that a naive approach of measuring isosceles right triangles could never be done accurately enough to prove irrationality. But there are constructive proofs. For example, you can demonstrate physically that if you have two identical squares made up of uniform square tiles, and you try to arrange the tiles into one large square, you will always have at least one tile left over, or be at least one tile short.

On the other hand, there are theorems that have no constructive proofs, but I don't think these demonstrate that there is something beyond physical reality. Aces beat Kings in poker, and you can't prove it with physics, but I don't see how that alters my fundamental view of the universe. I don't see how mathematical statements with no physical referents are any different from other consistent arbitrary rules made up by people.

Despite these minor carps, this is an excellent book, both for learning basic modern cosmology and for pondering some of the implications. It is written by a great physicist who is also a great educator, if not a great writer.

67 of 73 people found the following review helpful.
Not well written
By Ellen Jackson
The promos for this book make it sound as if it's for the general reading public. Well, it's not. There are equations and references to equations throughout. Muller skips over many difficult ideas without sufficient explanation, and these really need to be explained more thoroughly to a novice reader in the field of physics.

Also there are many digressions (do we really need to know how he decided to name his daughter?). In other places, where he needs to build his arguments carefully, he doesn't do it.

Here’s a passage from the middle of the book to demonstrate what I mean: “The vacuum contains energy. It can be polarized; that is, it responds to an electric field by separating its “virtual” charges. That polarization can be detected and measured by looking at the energy levels in the hydrogen atom (through something called the Lamb shift) and can be detected directly by the force the vacuum can exert on metal plates (the Casmir effect).” But Muller doesn’t explain the Lamb shift and he doesn’t explain the Casimir effect. I do know what some of these terms mean from reading other books, but I was lost in the woods anyway.

If you understand the above passage, then this is an appropriate book for you. If not, look elsewhere.

I did think Muller made some interesting points in the second half of the book, and I like that he’s willing to question the common wisdom in physics, e.g. the dogma of physicalism and the madcap rush of others to embrace string theory and MWI.

I thought the digression on souls and empathy was inappropriate for a book like this. But Muller is certainly the go-to guy for science fiction movies and series! He must have seen every one.

I'd recommend THE GOLDILOCKS ENIGMA (Paul Davies) or THE ELEGANT UNIVERSE by Brian Greene which are better introductions to some of these mind blowing concepts.

See all 59 customer reviews...

Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller PDF
Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller EPub
Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller Doc
Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller iBooks
Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller rtf
Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller Mobipocket
Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller Kindle

[Z869.Ebook] Download Ebook Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller Doc

[Z869.Ebook] Download Ebook Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller Doc

[Z869.Ebook] Download Ebook Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller Doc
[Z869.Ebook] Download Ebook Now: The Physics of Time, by Richard A. Muller Doc

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar